omr, sheet, fill, paper, hand, young, people, portrait, table, man, pencil, wooden, filled, wood, school, office, business, education, study, circle, choice, exam, form, document, exam, exam, exam, exam, exam. State filing forms: ten invented cases that show where owners had not decided
Photo by F1Digitals on Pixabay

Reviews

Part of State filing guides: the skeleton every state shares, and where they differ

State filing forms: ten invented cases that show where owners had not decided

Ten invented state filing cases grouped by the field that caused trouble, where a form surfaced a decision the owners had not yet made, with state fee figures.

Ten invented filings, each one showing a place where the process stopped being clerical. None of the ten is real; the state filing guide examples below are real and named. What they have in common is that in every case the problem was a decision the filer had not made, wearing the costume of a form field.

They are grouped by which field caused the trouble.

Real state filing guides show the same shape. California's Secretary of State publishes Form LLC-1, a $70 filing fee, and a $20 Statement of Information due within 90 days. Its bizfileOnline search checks name availability. Delaware's Division of Corporations charges $110 for a Certificate of Formation.

New York's Department of State charges $200 for Articles of Organization and requires publication within 120 days; costs vary by county, typically $300 to $1,500. These are actual examples, not the invented cases below.

What to take away

  • The name field causes the most rejections and the least lasting damage. The address and management fields cause the least trouble at the time and the most later.
  • Several of these were solved by asking the office a direct question, which is nearly always faster than reasoning from a general description.
  • Two of the ten were not filing problems at all. They were disagreements between owners that the form exposed.
  • Constructed cases show shape, never rules. Your state's office is the only source on what it requires.

Name problems

The name that was almost available. Rejected because it was not sufficiently distinguishable from an existing entry. The filer's instinct was to argue; the faster route was to ask the office what its test actually looks at and adjust.

Registry vs Trademark Name Checks

State registry

Test applied
Distinguishable
Outcome
Accepted
Fix
Adjust name

Trademark rights

Test applied
Prior use
Outcome
Unusable
Fix
Choose new name

The name that was available and unusable. Accepted by the registry, and already in use in the same trade by a business with prior rights. Different systems, different criteria, and the USPTO's explanation of what a trademark is is where the distinction is set out.

The name with a suffix problem. The intended suffix did not match what the form expected for that entity type. Trivial to fix at filing and awkward if it had gone through inconsistently, because everything downstream copies the registered name.

Address problems

The address that became public. A sole owner used a home address without asking what the office publishes. It is now searchable. Nothing is wrong with the filing; the decision was simply made without the information, which is the pattern in choosing where papers arrive.

The address nobody read. A former workspace, kept on the filing because updating it never rose to the top of anyone's list. Official correspondence went there for two years. The general problem of records that stop being true is covered in what has to be updated.

The out-of-state address. The filer used an address in the state they lived in rather than the state they were filing in, without checking whether the office accepted that. A single question to the office would have settled it in a minute.

Structure problems

The management box nobody discussed. Two owners, one of whom ticked a box on the form without conversation. It set who could bind the entity by default, and it did not match what either of them thought they had agreed. The form exposed a disagreement rather than creating one.

The ownership split that was never agreed. The filing did not ask for it, so nobody wrote it down. It surfaced at the first distribution. The reasoning about why this belongs on paper regardless is in comparing the structures.

Sequence problems

The federal identifier applied for first. Applied before the state confirmed the name, which then turned out to be unavailable. Two records now describe slightly different things, and unpicking that is more work than waiting was. The correct order is set out in the identifier explained.

Correct Filing Order

  1. First
    Confirm state name
  2. Then
    File state formation
  3. Then
    Apply for federal identifier
  4. Then
    Open bank account

The bank account opened too early. The founder tried to open an account in the entity's name before acceptance and before anybody was authorized to act for it. The bank was right to decline. What banks generally want to see is described by the SBA under opening a business account.

What the ten suggest

Ask the office. Six of the ten were resolved, or would have been, by a direct question to the office rather than by research. Offices answer questions about their own records quickly, and they are the only source that counts for their own state.

The other four were not about the office at all. They were decisions the owners had not made, and the form simply arrived before the conversation did.

Avoid that by reaching the form with every answer already written down, which is the point of preparing first. How to find and read the office's own material is covered in working with the filing office.

Common questions

Are these real filings?

No. Every one is invented, including the outcomes. They are shaped like problems that filing offices describe in general terms, and no real business appears.

Which is the most common?

The name being insufficiently distinguishable. It is also the least serious, because the office tells you immediately and the fix is quick.

Which is the most expensive?

The name that was available and already in use in trade, because the cost lands after signage, packaging and reputation have been built on it.

How do I avoid the structure problems?

Have the ownership and management conversation before you open the form, and write down what you agree. The form is not the place to discover a disagreement.

What is the fastest thing I can do today?

Read your own entry in the state's registry and check that every field on it is still true. Two of the ten above would have been caught by that alone.

More in Reviews

Latest from Trade Desk